Worldview

20th January
2015
written by Jeffrey Long

“Unless there is this theology that allows the total and complete presence of Jesus christ himself to be immediate, and directly present in every life situation and in every Christian’s life in that situation, unless he is immediately present with us and in us now, I’m sorry, none of this makes any sense.

Unless there is a contemporary reality to the immediacy of the presence of Christ and unless in that immediate presence he is capable of being everything he has ever been. And he can be that right now to you where you are and to the people you are with. Unless that’s true, all we are doing is worshipping history. And christianity as a historical story doesn’t interest me. That doesn’t mean I don’t think it’s important. It means I would not dedicate my life to history.” – Jerry Cook. From his message: “The Radical Relocation of God.”

Comments Off on The Radical Relocation of God
5th February
2013
written by Jeffrey Long

These are three examples of apparent contradictions in scripture taken from Hans Denck’s “Paradoxa,” 1526. [1. This is a footnote]

The seventh
a) I am not come to judge the world but to save the world [John 12:47]
b). For judgement I came into the world [John 9:39]

The eighth
a). If I testify on my own behalf that testimony is not true [John 5:31]
b). If I testify in my own behalf that testimony is true [John 8:14]

The eleventh
a). For who can resist his will? [Romans 9:19]
b). You have always resisted the Holy Spirit. [Acts 7:51]

Following is a translation of the work. I was very taken with this document when I attended the Associated Mennonite Seminary in the 90′s taking the class “Intro to Anabaptist History and Theology.” On the surface, it could be interpreted as a treatise on relativism, but more importantly, it is testament to the importance of diligence in reconciling contradictions rather then looking them over and relying on the Holy Spirit in interpretation.The following explanation is given in my copy, though I don’t know the source to be able to annotate it properly.”It is an attempt of the Reformer to demonstrate the higher spiritual unity which must be discovered if one is to understand Scripture aright and find in it the genuine path on which to walk…It provides an interesting key to Denck’s Scripture principle. Quotations taken out of their context without any explanation whatever suggest a rather superficial treatment of Scripture. Many of the “opposites” prove not to be such, it the excerpted passages are seen in their own context. Obviously a text without commentary may readily be taken in evidence for one view or another.The scripture passages cited by Denck have been rendered into English in a form as close to the German original as possible, in order to preserve the vivid and forceful juxtaposition of antithetical pairs he intended.” Note that some of the scriptures given are from the books known to Protestants today as the Apocrypha. I have kept them here because they are representative of the scriptures considered authoritative by the Anabaptists. For more on the Anabaptists use of the Apocrypha, there is an article you can read at the Mennonite Church USA archives website.
(more…)

Comments Off on Paradoxa: Contradictions in scripture according to Hans Denck, 1526AD
24th May
2012
written by Jeffrey Long

The Copernican Revolution

For centuries, astronomers tried to make sense of the strange motion of the celestial bodies we now know as planets. While the stars traveled a predictable path along the sky, the planets danced in strange patterns. These astronomers built elaborate models to try and predict the motion of the planets in the sky. But because they believed that the heavenlies revolved around the earth, they could never get their models quite right.

All of this changed in 1543 when Nicolaus Copernicus published “On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres.” In it, he demonstrated that the motion of the heavens can be explained without the Earth’s being in the geometric center of the system. In fact, rather then stationary, the Earth revolved around the sun.

The Copernican Revolution was one of the starting points for the Scientific Revolution of the 16th century. But it did not come without resistance. The idea that the heavens revolved around the Earth was not simply an insignificant belief; it was founded on what was believed to be clear teaching of the Bible and upheld by the authority of the church. It took 200 years for this new heliocentric model of the solar system to replace the geocentric model.

What is critical thinking?

Copernicus utilized a tool for solving the problem of the motion of planets that we call “Critiical Thinking.” Critical thinking is a method of testing assumptions based on asking a series of probing questions to determine whether a claim can be rationally justified with clarity and logical consistency. In order to make the jump to a solar system revolving around the sun, Copernicus used critical thinking to test the assumptions of Geocentricity by taking careful observations and asking probing questions of the data.

What it means to you

Hans Kuhn wrote that “To describe the innovation initiated by Copernicus as the simple interchange of the position of the earth and sun is to make a molehill out of a mountain in the development of human thought. If Copernicus’ proposal had had no consequences outside astronomy, it would have been neither so long delayed, nor so strenuously resisted.” (Kuhn, Thomas, The Copernican Revolution. Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought.) Since then, there has been a continual conflict between those who believe the interpretation of the Bible they have been taught, and that of scientific inquiry through use of critical thinking.

An important step in untraining our eyes is to end the conflict between Christianity and critical thinking. One way to do that is to recognize “the order of the universe” that we live in. St. Thomas Aquinas used this idea to argue for the existence of God; because there is design and order in the universe, it cannot be designed by chance, but only by design and purpose. Now it is time for Christians to turn Aqunias’ argument on its head; the order of the universe is not simply an argument for the existence of a creator god. It is an argument for an orderly god. For example: believing that we serve an orderly God, we can use critical thinking to test the age of the universe by comparing the ratio of the distance of stars with the speed of light. But if, as some people do, we insist on interpreting the Bible’s account of the creation of the universe as having occurred in 7 consecutive 24 hour days, then we must come to the conclusion that we serve a capricious God, not an orderly one. Because he created an aged universe that looks like it was millions of years old, when in fact it is only roughly 10,000 years old.

The importance of emphasizing critical thinking

When I explain the Copernican revolution to my Christian friends, they inevitably tell me that the revolution of the earth around the sun isn’t important to them. It is such a broadly held conviction that it seems irrelevant. But as Kung said, the shift in worldview caused by the revolution is far-reaching. It was the beginning of a slippery slope in which science would examine evidence, propose a hypothesis, and come to a conclusion that sometimes interfered with what was believed to be an inerrant teaching of the Bible.

I believe that this generation of Christians needs to step up to the plate and engage, rather than reject, the use of critical thinking to understand the order, and meaning, of the universe. A high view of scripture does not mean that the interpretations we have been taught are infallible. Every fresh movement of God in history has come from leaders and people who have re-examined the Bible and discovered a facet of truth that was overlooked by the generations before them. This can only come through sharpened thinking, and a willingness to challenge the beliefs we have been taught.

To get started, I encourage you to watch these 6 videos posted at io9.com on critical thinking. Over time, I will be posting each individually along with an essay on its importance in modern Christian thinking.

What about you?

What do you think about the tension between scientific and critical thinking and Christianity? Can it be resolved? Or do we have to pick sides? How has the tension impacted your life?

17th April
2012
written by Jeffrey Long

The reverberations from the Copernican Revolution, the paradigm shift from an Earth centered solar system to a Sun centered solar system, are still being felt today. A future post will go into detail in how this has impacted the church, both past, present and future. In the meantime, here is a gorgeous model of the two systems. In the lower right, you can toggle between Copernican (Heliocentric – Sun centered) and  Tychonian (Geocentric – Earth centered.) Other controls allow you to speed up or slow down the rotations, show the moon phase, show the zodiac and set the date. Let us know what you think in the comments.

Comments Off on The view from here: Animation of two theories about the orbits of our solar system’s planets.
26th February
2012
written by Jeffrey Long

“Some years ago, NASA released the first deep-space photographs of the beautiful cloud-swirled blue-green agate we call Earth. A reporter showed one of them to the late Samuel Shenton, then president of International Flat Earth Research Society. Shenton studied it for a moment and said, “It’s easy to see how such a picture could fool the untrained eye.”

Samuel Shenton, and his fellow members of the Flat Earth Society are a rather radical example of a problem we all have. Like them, our vision of our world is colored by what our eyes have been trained to see. When he looked at a picture of what was plainly a globe, he didn’t see the globe. He had trained his eyes to see the Earth as flat and thus wasn’t able to adjust his vision to a different reality.

My eyes were trained by two beliefs: deep trust in science and faith. The result has been that I don’t see things through one lens or the other. I tend to see through both. I will agree with some scientists regarding the origin of our species, while disagreeing with some people of faith on a literal six day creation of the Earth. But then I will disagree with some scientists about intelligent design and agree with the person of faith that God came before and created our universe.

But even still, my eyes are trained. I’ve dedicated a large part of my life to untrain them where necessary, by learning as much as I can, and not letting my biases get in the way of new ideas.

One purpose of this blog is to talk about that process of untraining my eyes.

Paul, one of the first teachers of the way of Jesus wrote this in a letter to a church in ancient Corinth. He said:

“For now we see in a mirror, dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part…”

NKJV 1Corinthians 13:9-12, 13

Paul was telling this fledgling church something that I always need to be reminded of: that my knowledge, whether about historic, scientific, political or spiritual matters, is limited. I only know parts of things. And sometimes those parts are pretty small. My vision is dim. I need the humility to listen to Stephen Hawking about the origin of the universe, and scholars like Robert Webber about the translation of the Greek New Testament of the Bible.

When we learn humility, it should lead us to being gracious to people who see things differently.

Unfortunately this is not always the case. A problem I’ve experienced is that when our eyes are trained on one view or another, we begin to suspect those whose eyes are trained differently. It’s one thing to see the Earth as flat. It’s another to question the spiritual integrity of someone who sees it as a globe. I once saw a video claiming that the earth was only 10,000 years old. While this is tomfoolery to me, I don’t feel the need to damn these people to hell. But the film took the time to brand a dissenting Christian scientist a heretic.

When creeds, hypothesis, doctrines, theories or moral laws come before graciousness, they inevitably lead to judgment. But when graciousness comes before knowledge, it informs that knowledge in a loving way.

So, the other purpose of this blog is to defend people’s integrity as Christians and thinkers, regardless of the training of their eyes, and not allow people to take the moral high ground against them. Because the whole point, Paul taught a sentence later is that while we know in part, what we do know is faith, hope and love. And the greatest of these is love. Not knowledge.